Tamil Nadu farmers faced soil degradation, rising input costs, and income instability—factors intensifying drought vulnerability. Save Soil–Regenerative Revolution (SS-RR) applied farmer-to-farmer training, peer networks, and market linkages to support a transition to natural farming. Over 34,000 farmers were reached, with 8,600 transitioning, improving soil fertility, water retention, and incomes. By demonstrating lower cultivation costs and better market access, SS-RR built the economic case for land restoration as a drought resilience strategy. Lessons highlight the importance of handholding, peer trust, and integrating market support with ecological interventions.
Background
Tamil Nadu, a drought-prone state in southern India, faces recurring water scarcity compounded by soil degradation and intensive farming. High input dependency on synthetic fertilizers and pesticides raised cultivation costs while depleting soil organic matter and water-holding capacity. This dual stress, declining productivity and rising financial burden led to farmer distress, migration, and reduced resilience to climatic shocks.
By 2007, farmer indebtedness and crop failures were escalating. Drought years saw disproportionately high impacts due to compacted soils with poor infiltration, leaving groundwater unrecharged. Many smallholders abandoned farming, undermining rural livelihoods and food security.
The challenge was multi-dimensional:
-
Environmental: Soil fertility and moisture-retention capacity collapsing under monoculture and chemical inputs.
-
Economic: High cost of cultivation eroding net incomes; dependence on volatile markets.
-
Social: Farmers losing trust in external solutions; youth leaving agriculture.
Addressing these challenges required not only ecological solutions but also strong economic justification for farmers to change practices. SS-RR (formerly “Thaimann Kaakkum Vivasayam”) emerged as a farmer-centered initiative to make land restoration economically viable, scalable, and socially acceptable.
Actions taken
SS-RR developed a holistic handholding model addressing both ecological restoration and farmer economics:
- Awareness & Training
- 395+ training conducted using 200+ successful natural farms as live demonstration hubs.
- Mega Agri-Startup Events linked natural farming to value addition and brand creation.
- Crop-specific Packages of Practices (PoPs) developed for 13 major crops.
- Peer & Expert Support Networks
- 242 WhatsApp groups (52,600+ farmers) enable rapid query resolution.
- Helpline service (12 hrs × 6 days) plus on-farm expert visits ensured continuity of support.
- Market & Income Support
- Direct farmer-consumer linkages established, reducing dependency on middlemen.
- 177 farmers facilitated in sales worth ₹9.78 crores.
- Training in small-scale processing/packaging for higher margins.
- Economic Framing of Interventions
- Farmers trained to evaluate net income rather than gross yield.
- Lower input costs (natural fertilizers, mulching, tree-based systems) improved profitability.
- Diversification into multi-layer cropping provided climate and price resilience.
- Community Reinforcement & Policy Alignment
- Regional review meetings reinforced collective learning and cultural pride.
- SS-RR aligned with SDGs and India’s CSR law, mobilizing wider institutional support.
Decisions were farmer-driven: successful farmers became trainers and proof of concept. Alternatives such as purely top-down technical interventions were set aside in favor of participatory farmer-to-farmer scaling, ensuring both credibility and adoption.
Outcomes
Quantitative results:
- 34,000+ farmers trained
- 8,600+ farmers transitioned fully to natural farming.
- 177 farmers facilitated in produce sales worth ₹9.78 crores.
- 600+ YouTube videos with 35M+ views amplified outreach.
Qualitative results:
- Farmers reported improved soil structure and water retention, reducing vulnerability to drought.
- Net incomes stabilized due to lower input costs and better direct sales channels.
- Peer trust overcame skepticism toward external promoters.
Policy and institutional impact:
- Demonstrated viability of farmer-led land restoration models in alignment with national natural farming goals (1 crore farmers, 7.5 lakh hectares).
- Built case for CSR and government support as livelihood-enhancing, drought-resilient interventions.
Remaining challenges:
- Initial transition costs and delayed returns still deter some farmers.
- Market linkages need to scale further to absorb rising natural produce volumes.
Sustainability:
The model’s strength lies in decentralization—peer trainers, local support networks, and resource leaders ensure continuity beyond project funding. Economic gains from reduced costs and better margins make natural farming a self-sustaining pathway.
Lessons Learned
The combination of healthy soil + low-input natural farming + diversification ensures that farmers have stable yields even during droughts, translating to stable income despite droughts.
Long-term farmer handholding is essential; one-off training fail to ensure adoption. Economic framing—focusing on net income, not just yields—drives farmer acceptance.
Peer-to-peer trust accelerates transition more effectively than external promotion.
Market linkages and value addition are critical to sustaining ecological practices.
Decentralized farmer networks make the model scalable and resilient.
